Accessed 22nd August 2013
Rape Culture At Work: Five Examples Of How Employers Turn Women Into Sex Objects
It’s no secret that women face a disproportionate amount of
discrimination in the workplace. One-third
of women say they have
been subject to some type of workplace discrimination at some point in their
careers — which can range from being paid less for
the same type of work, to being denied
a promotion, to being scrutinized more carefully than their male
colleagues.
But the issues that women encounter on
the job can run deeper than being unfairly assumed to be less competent or less
valuable than their male counterparts. In many cases, women are up against very
specific assumptions about their sexuality, their role as “objects” intended to
be attractive to men, and their responsibility to prevent men from desiring
them.
That attitude toward women’s bodies
becomes entrenched at an early age, as girls are told what type of clothing is
or isn’t appropriate to wear at school so
they don’t “distract” the male students. And it carries over into
the workplace, too, as adult women repeatedly receive the message that they are
responsible for both obscuring and leveraging their sexuality for men’s
purposes. Here are just five recent examples:
A New Jersey judge ruled
that casino waitresses can be fired for gaining weight.
Twenty two former cocktail servers sued
a popular casino in Atlantic City
over a policy that forbids waitresses from gaining more than seven percent of
their original body weight. The women were subject
to regular weigh-ins, and the policy meant that a 130-pound woman
was not allowed to gain more than 9.1 pounds. They alleged it was weight
discrimination — but an Atlantic County Superior Court Judge disagreed. In
July, the judge ruled that casino waitresses are essentially “sex
objects,” and it’s okay to fire them for gaining weight because they
are no longer fulfilling their contractual obligations.
A
widely-used employee training manual tells women how to make sure they don’t
lead men on.
Earlier this week, Jezebel
reported that a
popular manager training guide — used as companies like Google, Groupon, and
Modcloth — essentially tells women that they’re responsible for preventing
advances from their male co-workers. The manual tells women who are
“touchy-feely or flirtatious by nature” to “dial it back,” suggests women
socialize in groups, and advises women to avoid “revealing clothing” or “ending
statements with an upward inflection.”
Women at
Merrill Lynch have been instructed to seduce their way to the top.
Other employee trainings have similarly
gone off the rails when it comes to guidance on women’s behavior in the
workplace. Female employees at Merrill Lynch allege they were made to read a
book called “Seducing the Boys Club: Uncensored Tactics From a Woman at the
Top” and to make
use of its advice to get ahead. To get men to do their work, the
book suggested “play[ing] on their masculine pride and natural instincts to protect
the weaker sex.” To diffuse tense situations, it pointed out that men “puff up”
at being told, “Wow, you look great. Been working out?” The women also allege
that they were pressured to attend female-only events on “dressing for success”
and were told to be more “perky” and “bubbly.”
The Iowa Supreme Court
decided it’s okay to fire attractive women if they pose a risk to men’s
marriages.
James Knight, a dentist in Iowa , didn’t fire his
female assistant Melissa Nelson after 10 years of working for him because of
performance reasons. Instead, Nelson alleges that Knight’s wife told him to do
it because “she was a big threat to our marriage” given that he was sexually
attracted to her. Yet in July, the all-male Iowa Supreme Court stood by an
earlier decision that she wasn’t
improperly fired because
it wasn’t gender discrimination. Instead, her firing was found permissible
because of the facts surrounding her relationship with Knight, such as several
comments he made about her clothing and the fact that they texted each other
after work hours.
Two hotel
employees were fired after they complained about being photoshopped onto
bikini-clad bodies.
Two sisters, Martha and Lorena Reyes,
say they were fired from the Hyatt Hotel in Santa Clara , CA
after they complained
about photoshopped images of them. In the photos, the women’s heads
were photoshopped onto the bodies of women wearing bikinis. Lorena told Jezebel
that they were “extremely humiliating and shameful for me” and also said she
has never worn a bikini, even at home. While the company says it fired them two
days after they complained about the images because they took overly long
breaks, the sisters feel it was related to the incident. The Reyes sisters have
filed a retaliation charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
***
Just like when it comes to school
dress codes, the issues at play in the above scenarios are
ultimately a manifestation of rape culture. Many Americans think of “rape
culture” specifically in the context of incidences
of sexual assault, but it’s actually a pervasive
societal attitude about
women’s sexuality that runs much deeper and influences a much
broader range of interactions. When women in the workplace are
sexualized in these ways, they’re receiving the message that their bodies have
everything to do with men’s reactions to them and nothing to do with their own
autonomy or consent. This approach to gender roles assumes that men can’t
control themselves around women, and it’s women’s responsibility to figure out
how to handle that. And ultimately, this culture contributes to high rates of
sexual harassment in the workplace: One in four women report
having experienced such abuse.
But once women and men internalize
those messages about women’s bodies, it’s not hard to see why many of them may
assume that women who are subject to that sexual harassment — or other types of
sexual violence — probably did something to “deserve
it.”